Breaking News
0

Trump abandons plan to host 2020 G7 meeting at his Florida golf resort

PoliticsOct 20, 2019 12:38AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 

By David Shepardson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump abandoned plans late on Saturday to host next year's Group of Seven summit at his Florida golf resort, after Democrats and others had decried the selection as evidence of the president misusing his office for personal gain.

In a series of tweets, Trump said he would drop the plan announced Thursday by White House acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney to host the meeting at Trump National Doral golf resort near Miami from June 10 to 12. Trump cited what he termed "Crazed and Irrational Hostility" from Democrats and the news media in explaining the reversal. "We will begin the search for another site, including the possibility of Camp David, immediately," he wrote.

The Republican president faces criticism and a number of congressional investigations over his finances and potential conflicts of interest stemming from his real estate business, which he still owns, and an impeachment inquiry into accusations that he pursued political interests in his dealings with Ukraine.

On Saturday, Trump sought in his unusual reversal to emphasize what he said were the resort's positive features for hosting a large gathering. "I thought I was doing something very good for our Country," he wrote on Twitter.

The U.S. constitution's emoluments clause prohibits government officials from receiving salaries, fees or profits from foreign and domestic governments without congressional approval.

Watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington said on Saturday the initial decision to award the event to a Trump property was "stunningly corrupt" but the "reversal shows that pressure works".

"The president deserves no plaudits for doing the right thing only after public outcry forced him not to do the wrong thing," it said.

Democrats have said they would investigate Trump's plan to host the G7 at his property after he floated the idea in August. The decision also sparked criticism from a number of Republicans.

In a statement on Thursday, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler called the announcement "among the most brazen examples yet of the president's corruption." Nadler said the committee would continue investigating "regarding these matters."

The announcement prompted requests from Democrats for detailed records from the White House to explain why other 11 other sites were not chosen and how much taxpayers would pay.

In May, the Washington Post reported Doral's operating income had fallen 69 percent since 2015, citing company documents that it reviewed.

Mulvaney had suggested on Thursday that Trump would not profit from use of the property because any charges would be "at cost."

He also said using Doral "was millions of dollars cheaper" than other facilities and would lead to a "roughly 50% savings" - but the White House did not release any documents to explain that analysis.

Then President Barack Obama held the 2012 G8 summit at Camp David, which is in Maryland, about 60 miles (100 km) northwest of Washington.

Trump first floated the idea in August after attending the G7 in France. He has also hosted world leaders at some of his other properties, including at his Mar-a-Lago oceanfront club in Palm Beach, Florida.

Trump abandons plan to host 2020 G7 meeting at his Florida golf resort
 

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments
rob finch
rob finch Oct 20, 2019 6:35AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The dems just cost us more tax money and have Trump derangement. In other news dog bites man.
Show previous replies (3)
Al Vlaj
alvlaj Oct 20, 2019 6:35AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
rob finchTax cuts are not spending. But this president actually spends like a socialist. Maybe its because he was a democrat for 8yrs before hijacking the GOP.
rob finch
rob finch Oct 20, 2019 6:35AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Ethanol subsidies were Busy but I don't remember never-bushers. Trump education Secretary wasn't popular with the more expensive brick and mortar school crowd. And nationalists don't act as the global police force.
Al Vlaj
alvlaj Oct 20, 2019 6:35AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
rob finchTrump is paying farmers that are losing money because of a trade war he caused. Our tax dollars are paying to buy their vote. Those are socialist subsidies to farmers but i dont hear you complaining about that.
rob finch
rob finch Oct 20, 2019 6:35AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
I don't like agricultural subsidies any more than you do, however it's not anything new or unique to the Trump administration when cronies get paid not to grow corn.
Al Vlaj
alvlaj Oct 20, 2019 6:35AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
rob finchi agree. But your argument is that dems cost us more tax money and my point is that Trump is spending even more than Dems ever have. EVER. That bill is footed by the US taxpayer.
Alex Cavasin
Alex Cavasin Oct 20, 2019 4:46AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Let me understand this, saving the taxpayer money by making his own infrastructures available at cost is corruption...but...getting hundreds of millions of dollars for accommodating lobbyists and passing shady laws is not?
Adrian White
Adrian White Oct 20, 2019 4:46AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Even if it were "at cost" which is very unlikely, Trump would still benefit from the exposure it would bring to his property. Don't kid yourself. Trump wasn't planning this to save the taxpayers money. (That's just the excuse that his staff came up with after the questioning started). Trump is always putting himself first and everyone else second. It's his nature.
Don Getty
Don Getty Oct 20, 2019 1:12AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
smell test failure - 1 for justice - many more to come!
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email