Breaking News
0

Fed Minutes Show Panel Sharply Divided On Monetary Policy, Rate Cuts

www.investing.com/analysis/fed-minutes-show-panel-sharply-divided-on-monetary-policy-rate-cuts-200457390
Fed Minutes Show Panel Sharply Divided On Monetary Policy, Rate Cuts
By Darrell Delamaide/Investing.com   |  Aug 22, 2019 01:41AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 

Minutes of the Federal Reserve policy meeting at the end of July, released yesterday after the usual three-week delay, confirmed that Fed Chair Jerome Powell was trying to walk a tightrope in combat boots as he attempted to smooth over differences in a sharply divided Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC).

As a rule, such minutes generally refer to “some,” “a few” or “several” participants holding a particular belief, but lately there has been more granularity than usual with “a couple” of participants getting their voices heard several times.

In fact, “a couple” of participants actually wanted a half-point cut in rates at the meeting instead of the quarter-point that was agreed upon.

They may have been nonvoting members or voting members who didn’t feel their disagreement rose to the level of a formal dissent. In any case, the actual dissent came from two members, Esther George of the Kansas City Fed and Eric Rosengren of the Boston Fed, who dissented because they didn’t want any cut at all.

According to the minutes, “several” participants wanted to hold steady, given low unemployment. No clues were provided as to who the others were beyond the two dissenters, though presumably they were nonvoting regional bank heads. “A few” were concerned that action to ease monetary policy would reflect negatively on the economy.

Just how far policymakers behind their closed doors might be overthinking this whole thing came in the rather odd report on the runoff of bond holdings acquired as part of quantitative easing. The decision to stop the runoff two months earlier than originally planned seemed consistent with an accommodative interest-rate policy, but apparently there was concern that it would give the “erroneous impression” that the balance sheet was an active tool of policy.

Duh. The minutes writer didn’t give any indication whether “many” or “several” were on either side of that discussion.

The core of the minutes, though, was that policymakers “generally” wanted to avoid “any appearance of following a preset course.” A quarter-point cut should be seen as a “recalibration” of policy, or, as Powell parroted in his press conference, “a mid-cycle adjustment.”

These were precisely the things that tormented investors, who really did want, and expect, a preset course of further rate cuts.

There may be a certain hypocrisy in the Fed minutes, because investors overwhelmingly—98.5% according to Fed funds futures contracts—expect a further, quarter-point cut in September and if the Powell Fed has shown anything, it's that it does not want to intentionally disturb investors.

The lip service to flexibility may have been simply a refusal to acknowledge the Twitter declamations of 'he who shall not be named,' and the reason Powell was wearing combat boots.

President Trump has realized that all he has to do is threaten tariffs to alarm market participants and force the Fed’s hand in lowering interest rates. Trump on Monday called for a full point cut in rates, though of course he will be happy with a quarter-point, which the Fed can hardly deny him.

It is, if it hasn't yet become clear, a curious situation, one that gets curiouser and curiouser by the moment.

Investors will be tuned in to Powell’s speech Friday at the Jackson Hole conference, hoping for further indications about the Fed’s plans. If he remains true to the FOMC’s desire to avoid the appearance of a preset course, he will be disappointingly anodyne.

Fed Minutes Show Panel Sharply Divided On Monetary Policy, Rate Cuts
 
Fed Minutes Show Panel Sharply Divided On Monetary Policy, Rate Cuts

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments
Uz IL
Uz IL Aug 22, 2019 11:00PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Thanks Darrell!
David Lowe
David Lowe Aug 22, 2019 11:20AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
More and more curious, “curiouser and curiouser.” So annoying!
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email